Friday, March 13, 2015

“Black-on Black Crime" and What It Doesn’t Represent



by Charles Giammona

There is a logical fallacy used in conversations about crime and race.

Many people (particularly the political right-wing) argue that for Black people to demand justice following murders of unarmed African-Americans by white people is to demonstrate a hypocritical disposition towards criminality and the justice system. 

This phenomenon is often referred to as “Black-on-Black Crime.” The resounding message is that Blacks need to address crime within their own community before attempting to address it outside of their community.  This point of view is valid.    

But to argue that the intra-racial phenomenon of crime victimization is unique to the Black community is to demonstrate an inaccurate assessment of crime and victimization. This argument builds on an ugly stereotype of black pathological violence.  It propagates stop and frisk policies, school to prison pipeline, mass incarceration and the knee jerk reactions of officers and vigilantes to shoot first and cry self-defense later.

The perception of rampant black violence is poorly founded on reality. There is a pervasive fear of gun violence at the hands of young black men, even though only 4% have ever even held a gun. Indeed, only ~1% of Black people in the United State commit any violent crime in a given year.  But the statistics are rarely stated this way. Thus, the term 'black-on-black violence' slanders the majority of law-abiding Black Americans, rich and poor, who get painted by this broad and crude (read racist or ignorance) brush.

The rarely-bemoaned ‘white-on-white’ crime pandemic is as prevalent as black-on-black crime. Eighty-six percent of homicides against white people are committed by other white people.  As the largest racial group, whites commit the majority of crimes in America and are responsible for the majority of violent crimes. When whiteness is treated as the default culture, white-on-white crime is not seen as a cultural symptom, but, by default, deemed ‘normal,' understandable, or a status quo crime statistic.

The reality is that most crime is perpetrated within race. We live in largely segregated environments. As with most activities we participate in, crime occurs in a segregated fashion.  If African-Americans are more likely to be robbed, or injured, or killed by other African-Americans, it’s because they tend to live in the same neighborhoods as each other. Same is true for white folk.            

Crime within the Black community is indisputably an issue, but the “Black-on-Black Crime” catch phrase should not be confused with its use to politically deflect from the racism and racial profiling that precipitates large scale racial injustice/distrust by referencing the different social subject of ‘black-on-black violence.’  We can all simultaneously work toward improving crime trends and demand justice.  

So, let protesters continue their pursuits.  If they want to march, let them march, if they want to sit-in, let them sit-in, if they want to boycott, let them boycott--because when all is said and done, protestors (or political campaign contributions) are vessels that move this nation.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Ignorance as a Virtue--A New Reality?



Today’s conservative movement has a zeal for ideology that is fueled by unlearning basic facts and knowledge of math, science, geography and reality.  All too well these political fundamentalists reject reason, facts, logic, wisdom and knowledge to keep their sentient-based mindset/constituency. This summarizes their zealous attitude and its result: despite their commitment, they feel established in their own righteousness.

Spurting out verbal rubbish you know nothing about is traditionally considered unwise at best. But ignorance has started to become less a handicap, and even a sense of pride!  One being belligerently ignorant is now offended if anyone dare suggest ignorance is less desirable than knowledge in the face of expertise. 

With a great deal of zeal, they go about thinking and saying they are serving God and country, but all they do is produce their own set of standards or realities. Their zeal is probably their greatest barrier to the truth and to justice.  

More importantly, it prevents them from objectively serving the ‘common good,’ i.e., the very American system and tradition they zealously try to revise in their own image and likeness by embracing ignorance as a virtue. Their minds are blinded by zeal, not served by it.

Frederic Bastiat said, "When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."  I finally realize why we need 35 million laws to keep the 10 commandments.

We obsess about homeland security, ‘enemies’ all around us and threats to our way of life.  But America will never be destroyed from the outside.  If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves by not seeing truth within instead of taking a contemptuous view of reality and growing proudly ignorant day by day. 

Ignorance is not the equivalent of expertise nor is wishful thinking and unblinking prejudice the same as evidence and reason.