Community and Technical Colleges in the
1960’s and 70’s were often viewed as places created by legislatures to train
technicians and service workers for local business and feed bright learners to
local four year universities.
Most learners were the first in their
families to attend college. Open
admissions policies were trumpeted as the great democratizer for minority
groups, women and people who scraped through high school. But taxpayers balked at paying for frills
like dorms, athletics and intellectual gibberish. Two years. Learn a skill. Go to work.
Four year institutions, which might have felt
threatened by the competition if they had seen the future, liked the idea that
two year schools would teach boring introductory courses for them and sift
through the hordes for those worthy of transfer.
In this shadow academic world, professors
taught many hours of basic classes, and were recognized by their university
peers as submissive, second-class citizens in second-class institutions. Sadly, many who worked and studied in our
two-year college institutions also believed that.
Then the world changed. Two-year schools more than doubled in number
in the 1970’s and the U.S. two-year college model was exported around the
world.
Today, the educational philosophy of two-year
colleges reflects a split consciousness between careers and ideas and between
security and esteem. This odd mixture is
now a model for business and other non-educational organizations in our
society.
Today, about half of all four year university
undergraduates have attended two-year colleges, many claiming their education
there was the best they ever received.
Today, two-year colleges have more excellent
learners than ever; they seek us out now.
More importantly, we celebrate the hard cases; they stretch our hearts.
Today, we are the tension between the
commercial and intellectual, the community and the academy, between how and
why. We more truly reflect our culture
and society than do institutions with screened, more homogeneous populations.
Each day, we help to that first rung on the
ladder of success, a few who were supposed to fail. What we have done, that few anticipated, was
to truly care about learners that others discounted. This is not submission, but fulfillment.
No comments:
Post a Comment